Soyuz FG vs Space Shuttle
Side-by-side comparison across specs, pricing, and overall score — every value traced to a source.
Verdict: Space Shuttle ranks highest overall (#3) with a score of 59.1.
The best choice still depends on which specs matter for your workload — per-metric winners are marked below.
What the numbers hide
Computed from the published values below — no estimates, no generated claims.
Fragile verdict
The overall winner flips to Soyuz FG if Failed Launches is weighted at 50% (it counts for 10% today). If failed launches drives your decision, the ranking above may not be your ranking.
Real tradeoff
Soyuz FG clearly beats Space Shuttle on Failed Launches but clearly loses on LEO Capacity — this pair is a priorities question, not a quality question.
What nobody reports
Launch Cost (1 of 2 missing) — the questions worth asking vendors directly.
AI hot take
Sign in to generate a contrarian AI read of this comparison.
| Metric | Soyuz FGProgress Rocket Space Center | Space ShuttleNational Aeronautics and Space Administration |
|---|---|---|
| Overall OptiSift Score | 51.0#9 | 59.1#3 |
| LEO Capacity | 6,450 | 27,500 |
| Successful Launches | 59 | 133 |
| Launch Cost | — | 450,000,000 |
| Failed Launches | 1 | 2 |
| Launch Mass | 305 | 2,030 |
| Length | 49.5 | 56.1 |
| Diameter | 3 | 8 |
| Reusable | No | Yes |