Gemini 3.5 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
Side-by-side comparison across metrics, pricing, and overall score — every value traced to a source.
Verdict: DeepSeek V4 Flash ranks highest overall (#1) with a score of 70.9.
The best choice still depends on which metrics matter for your workload — per-metric winners are marked below.
What the numbers hide
Computed from the published values below — no estimates, no generated claims.
Fragile verdict
The overall winner flips to Gemini 3.5 Flash if Context Window is weighted at 55% (it counts for 25% today). If context window drives your decision, the ranking above may not be your ranking.
Real tradeoff
Gemini 3.5 Flash clearly beats DeepSeek V4 Flash on Context Window but clearly loses on Input Price — this pair is a priorities question, not a quality question.
AI hot take
Sign in to generate a contrarian AI read of this comparison.
| Metric | Gemini 3.5 FlashGoogle | DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Overall OptiSift Score | 33.1#7 | 70.9#1 |
| Input Price | $1.5 | $0.14 |
| Output Price | $9 | $0.28 |
| Cache Read Price | $0.15 | $0 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 66K | 384K |
| Tool Calling | Yes | Yes |
| Extended Reasoning | Yes | Yes |